Continuia is a second-opinion platform for complex, high-stakes cases the ones where diagnosis is uncertain, the workup is incomplete, or the clinical picture doesn’t add up. We built it around a network of experienced physicians who review cases on their terms, not ours.
As a peer reviewer, you’ll receive curated cases not routine, not high-volume. You’ll produce structured second-opinion assessments asynchronously, on your schedule, with full clinical context provided. Diagnostic complexity is the norm here: multi-system presentations, ambiguous findings, cases where a second perspective genuinely moves the needle.
This is peer-level work. You’ll be part of a clinical network that takes rigor seriously, with structured tools that support your reasoning rather than shortcut it. If you’ve ever wished tumor boards and case conferences were easier to access this is built around that instinct.
What we’re looking for:
MD or equivalent with an active license
strong diagnostic reasoning, and the ability to write clear clinical assessments.
Experience in diagnostics, internal medicine, or complex case management is a natural fit.
Telemedicine or consultation experience is a plus.
Contract engagement. Remote. Flexible hours that fit around your existing practice.
